# Creative-production practice and revision record

Loptr Lab learning exercise. This is a human review record, not an AI-response
evaluation, qualification, certification or acceptance into a project.
Download, edit and save this file locally. Keep your own project files separately.
This blank template does not autosave. Use a saved copy to resume.

## Objective and source

Resource ID and publisher:
Exact lesson/project title and URL:
Lesson access confirmed by me (date, version, relevant captions/transcript):
One skill I want to demonstrate:
Brief: what I will make, intended audience, constraints and completion requirements:
Accessible alternative or workflow adaptation:

## Rights and provenance

Collection discovery: Natan Zaretsky, “12 Animation + Visual Effects YouTube Channels”
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nati-zaretsky_12-animation-visual-effects-youtube-channels-share-7524402638130421760-84h_/

Source lesson creator(s) and credits:
My original contribution:
External assets, licenses, permissions and required attribution:
Tool/version; any AI-assisted steps and what I checked:
Do not attach third-party media without permission. Do not include private records.

## Select the appropriate external reference before reviewing

Use the categories mapped on the Hybrid Creative Technology activity. Open the
original source for its descriptors; the following is not a replacement rubric.

- Animation: “12 Principles of Animation Project Rubric”, hosted on Adobe Education
  Exchange. The PDF does not identify its individual author. Four source levels,
  4 through 1; categories: Completeness and Quality; Creativity; Following Project
  Guidelines; Technical.
  https://cdn.edex.adobe.com/v3/uploads/resourceFile/2014/8543b976-6102-11e2-9a53-12313b016471.99d43c63-a0f9-4277-b632-5b37818d5e3c.pdf
- Visual production or interpretation: University of Nebraska–Lincoln, ACE 2D.
  Select Production OR Interpretation as mapped; use its original 4–1 descriptors.
  https://ace.unl.edu/ace-2-rubric/
- VFX/video: University of Technology Sydney, “Video assessment criteria categories”.
  This is a criteria-selection guide, not a fixed numerical scoring rubric.
  Record qualitative evidence and feedback without inventing a score.
  https://educationexpress.uts.edu.au/collections/using-video-for-assessment/resources/video-assessment-criteria-categories/

Selected source, section, access date and mapped categories:
Reviewer role: self / peer / instructor (default: self; no private identity needed).
Optional peer/instructor review is separate feedback, not verified grading.

## Review 1 — first version

Artifact version and local filename:
For EACH mapped category record:
- Exact category name:
- Source level and matching descriptor reference, if the source supplies levels:
- Specific evidence (frame, timestamp, node, parameter or written explanation):
- Limitation or uncertainty:
- One actionable improvement:

Do not calculate a combined score, pass mark or weighted total across sources.

## Feedback and revision plan

Self-review feedback:
Optional separate peer/instructor feedback and reviewer role:
What I will change and why:
If evidence is missing, produce it before assigning a level.

## Review 2 — revised version

Revised artifact version and local filename:
Repeat EACH mapped category using the same source and descriptors:
- Exact category name:
- Source level and descriptor reference, if applicable:
- Specific evidence:
- Change from Review 1:
- Remaining limitation:

Keep both versions and reviews. These two documented review rounds do not consume
or reset the separate two-attempt AI Literacy assessment.

## Resume, backup and optional sharing

Last completed step:
Next action:
Location of project files and saved review record:
Date of backup and successful reopen check:

Save after each review. Reopen the saved file before closing your working copy.
Back up the file and original assets together using your existing storage workflow.
Where the existing Creative Filing Library is available, its Markdown import can
retain this as legacy text; it does not automatically score creative work or turn
this record into a structured animation assessment. Do not assume the pending
Library feature is deployed on your current training site.

Review visibility, licenses and attribution before sharing through your existing
PIXIE/GitHub checkpoint. Do not create a second learner tracker.